The International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO)
published a paper on the factors of Credible Deterrence in the Enforcement of
Securities Regulation. The factors referred to in the paper highlight useful
enforcement practices and powers adopted by various regulatory authorities
around the world to promote and encourage credible deterrence of misconduct.
The paper reflects the collective experience and expertise of the member
jurisdictions of IOSCO’s Committee 4 on Enforcement and the Exchange of
Information.
The study of misconduct is relevant in light of the impact it has in
securities and investment markets. Consumers, investors, capital markets,
institutions, national economies and global financial systems are all impacted
when the integrity of securities and investment markets are undermined by
misconduct.
As defined in the paper: ‘ Deterrence is credible when would-be
wrongdoers perceive that the risks of engaging in misconduct outweigh the
rewards and when non-compliant attitudes and behaviours are discouraged.
Deterrence occurs when persons who are contemplating engaging in misconduct are
dissuaded from doing so because they have an expectation of detection and that
detection will be rigorously investigated, vigorously prosecuted and punished
with robust and proportionate sanctions’.
The task of regulators and supervisors is to develop and enforce
strong regulation that holds individuals and entities accountable and deters
misconduct, and in doing so, promotes public confidence in financial markets.
Although the paper focuses on the enforcement programmes, it also recognizes
that other regulatory activities, such as authorisation and supervision, also
have a strategic function in deterring misconduct.
The enforcement scheme involves an effective sanctions regime,
strong and resilient regulatory governance, comprehensive enforcement powers, and good
regulatory practices such as timeliness of enforcement intervention and holding
individuals and entities accountable.
The paper emphasises
the difficulties faced by authorities when they take the compromise to guarantee, in absolute terms, that those who engage in misconduct
will be detected, prosecuted and sanctioned, and will receive no personal
benefit from their wrongdoing. Thence, there is no one-size-fits-all approach
but whatever the regulatory model (twin peaks, integrated, industry-based or
functional) and approach (risk, principles or rule- based) a common implied or
explicit objective of enforcement programmes is credible deterrence.
The paper complements the IOSCO Objectives and Principles of
Securities Regulation (IOSCO Principles), which set out a framework to achieve
the objectives of regulation. It does not alter the Principles or the Methodology,
which support the assessment of compliance with the Principles.
The paper is available here
The paper is available here
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.